Leukocyte/Neutrophil Alkaline Phosphatase (LAP/NAP) Stain

In this article

Introduction

The leukocyte alkaline phosphatase stain is one of those classic hematology tests. It is simple, inexpensive, and visually striking under the microscope. It was once the go-to lab tool for telling chronic myeloid leukemia apart from a leukemoid reaction. Today, molecular tests have taken over that job, but the LAP stain has not disappeared. It remains a teaching cornerstone and a practical fallback in many labs around the world [1].

This article walks through the principle, the protocol, and the clinical interpretation of the LAP score, with the modern diagnostic context kept in mind throughout.

Where the LAP Stain Fits Today

Current World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification frameworks (both updated in 2022) define CML by the presence of the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene, detected through quantitative RT-PCR or cytogenetic analysis [6,7]. Treatment response is also monitored by molecular methods, with European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations specifying BCR-ABL1 transcript milestones during tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy [8].

So where does the LAP stain still earn its place?

  • As a rapid, low-cost adjunct when molecular testing is unavailable or delayed.
  • As a teaching tool that links neutrophil maturation, enzyme biology, and clinical hematology in one slide.
  • As a supportive marker in some myeloproliferative neoplasms and other non-CML conditions [3,4].

Knowing this context up front makes the rest of the article easier to interpret.

Differentiation of CML from Leukemoid Reaction

Image depicting a peripheral blood smear of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), showcasing leukocytosis with immature granulocytes, basophilia, and eosinophilia
The presence of leukocytosis with immature granulocytes, basophilia, and eosinophilia in a blood smear serves as a telltale sign of CML, a condition characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of granulocytes in the bone marrow. These abnormal cells, characterized by their increased numbers and immature morphology, are a direct consequence of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome translocation, a genetic alteration that leads to the overproduction of the BCR-ABL oncogene.

Both CML and a leukemoid reaction can push the white blood cell count well above normal. Both feature lots of neutrophils. To the naked eye on a slide, they can look surprisingly similar. The difference matters: one is a clonal cancer that needs lifelong TKI therapy, the other is a benign reaction to an infection or another stressor.

Several features help separate them, and the LAP score is one of the classic discriminators. The table below summarizes the main contrasts.

Differential Diagnosis
Leukemoid Reaction vs. Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)
Both conditions can present with striking leukocytosis, but they differ fundamentally in etiology, morphology, and molecular markers. The LAP score and BCR-ABL1 status are the pivotal distinguishing tests.
Leukemoid Reaction finding
CML finding
★ Key differentiator
Feature Leukemoid Reaction CML Neoplastic
Cause Reactive (infection, inflammation) Clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm
Onset Acute Insidious, chronic
Symptoms Related to underlying cause Fatigue, weight loss, night sweats, splenomegaly
WBC Count Often <50,000/µL Often >100,000/µL
Maturation Mainly mature neutrophils, clear left shift Full granulocyte spectrum (myelocyte bulge)
Blasts Absent or <5% <5% in chronic phase
Toxic Changes Often present (Döhle bodies, vacuoles) Usually absent
Basophilia / Eosinophilia Generally absent or mild Almost always present
LAP Score Normal or elevated Low or absent
Philadelphia Chromosome Absent Present in 90–95% of cases
BCR-ABL1 Fusion Gene Absent Present in virtually all cases
Splenomegaly Absent or mild Common, often marked
★ = key differentiating features.

Confirming CML

In a real workup, a low LAP score points toward CML, but the diagnosis is confirmed by detecting BCR-ABL1 [6,7].

Principle of LAP Stain

The stain is built on a simple chemistry trick. Mature neutrophils carry plenty of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) inside their cytoplasm. The test makes that enzyme reveal itself by leaving behind a colored deposit wherever it is active.

Here is what happens, step by step:

  1. A diazonium salt (a reactive coupling dye) is applied to the smear together with naphthol AS-BI phosphate, a substrate.
  2. ALP inside the neutrophil cytoplasm cleaves the phosphate from naphthol AS-BI phosphate, releasing free naphthol.
  3. The free naphthol couples with the diazonium salt to form an insoluble blue-violet or reddish-brown azo dye (the exact color depends on the salt used).
  4. The deposit shows up as granules in the cytoplasm under the microscope.

The more enzyme present, the heavier the staining. Mature, healthy neutrophils stain darkly; immature or abnormal neutrophils, like those in CML, stain weakly or not at all [1].

A man putting immersion oil on a slide  which is placed on the mount of a microscope

Materials

  • Fresh, unstained peripheral blood smears (heparinized blood or fresh capillary smears)
  • Known positive control smear (e.g., from a patient with a confirmed leukemoid reaction, or third-trimester pregnancy) and a known negative control smear (e.g., from a confirmed CML case)
  • Freshly prepared fixative: 1 part 40% formaldehyde to 9 parts absolute methanol, kept ice-cold (0–10°C)
  • Naphthol AS-BI phosphate
  • 0.2 mol/L Tris buffer, pH 9.0
  • Fast Blue BB salt (the coupling azo dye)
  • Neutral red, 0.02% aqueous solution (counterstain)
  • Filter paper and funnel
  • Mounting medium (Depex) and coverslips

Safety Note

Formaldehyde, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), and diazonium salts are all hazardous. Work in a fume hood, wear gloves and eye protection, and dispose of waste according to local biohazard and chemical-safety rules.

Protocol

The full method is summarized at the start of the article. The detailed steps are:

  1. Prepare stock substrate solution. Dissolve 30 mg naphthol AS-BI phosphate in 0.5 mL N,N-dimethylformamide and add 100 mL 0.2 mol/L Tris buffer.
  2. Prepare working buffered substrate solution. Warm 40 mL of stock substrate solution to room temperature and add 24 mg of Fast Blue BB salt. Mix until fully dissolved. Filter through filter paper before use.
  3. Fix the smears. Place fresh smears in the chilled fixative for 30 seconds.
  4. Rinse with gently running tap water for 2–3 minutes. Air dry.
  5. Incubate the slides in working buffered substrate solution for 15–30 minutes at room temperature.
  6. Rinse with gently running tap water for 1–2 minutes.
  7. Air dry the slides.
  8. Counterstain in neutral red for 3 minutes.
  9. Rinse briefly and air dry.
  10. Mount with Depex and apply a coverslip.
  11. View under oil immersion (×100 objective).

Manufacturer kits may vary slightly. Always follow the kit insert when one is supplied.

Interpretation

Leukocyte alkaline phosphatase stain peripheral blood smear evaluation. This image illustrates the LAP / NAP scoring system used to quantify neutrophils - whether they are mainly mature or immature cells.
This illustrative image provides a comprehensive overview of the leukocyte alkaline phosphatase scoring system, highlighting its effectiveness in quantifying neutrophils, atypical lymphocytes, and plasma cells. The LAP score (NAP score) is used to assess neutrophil maturity. Higher scores (darker staining) indicate more mature neutrophils, typically associated with normal function. 

The LAP score reflects how mature and how active a sample's neutrophils are. Stronger staining means more enzyme, which generally means more mature, healthy cells.

To produce a score:

  1. Count 100 consecutive mature neutrophils and band forms under oil immersion. Skip eosinophils and basophils — they do not carry the enzyme.
  2. Grade each cell on the 0–4 scale below.
  3. Add the grades together.
Leukocyte Alkaline Phosphatase
LAP Scoring System
Each of 100 mature neutrophils is graded 0–4 based on alkaline phosphatase granule staining intensity. The LAP score is the sum of all grades (range 0–400). Normal reference range is approximately 20–100.
Grade Neutrophil Staining Interpretation
0
No stained granules Negative
1
Occasional stained granules Weakly positive
2
Moderate granules Positive
3
Numerous granules Strongly positive
4
Dense granules covering the nucleus Heavily positive
LAP Score = sum of grades across 100 neutrophils  ·  Range: 0–400  ·  Normal: ~20–100
Score 100 neutrophils per slide. Each cell receives one grade (0–4).

Because each of 100 cells can score 0 to 4, the total falls between 0 and 400. The normal adult range is 20–100 [1].

Worked example. Say 30 neutrophils score 0, 40 score 1, 20 score 2, and 10 score 3. The LAP score = (30×0) + (40×1) + (20×2) + (10×3) = 0 + 40 + 40 + 30 = 110. That sits just above the normal range, suggesting mild reactive elevation.

A score above 100 suggests a leukemoid reaction or another reactive cause. A score below 20 raises concern for CML, PNH, or another bone marrow disorder. As always, the LAP score is interpreted alongside the full clinical picture and other lab results [1].

Clinical Significance of a High LAP score (NAP score)

A high LAP score most often points to a benign, reactive process where mature neutrophils are produced in larger-than-usual numbers. Common causes include:

  • Leukemoid reaction from severe infection (sepsis, pneumonia, abscess), inflammation (rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis, inflammatory bowel disease), tissue necrosis (burns, myocardial infarction, pancreatitis), some solid tumors, or corticosteroid therapy [1].
  • Myeloproliferative neoplasms other than CML. Polycythemia vera classically shows a high LAP score linked to the JAK2 V617F mutation [4]. Essential thrombocythemia tends to be normal to slightly raised. Primary myelofibrosis is variable, and some calreticulin (CALR)-mutated cases show notably low scores [3].
  • Hodgkin lymphoma in some cases [1].
  • Down syndrome, in whom the LAP score is naturally higher.
  • Pregnancy and lactation because of hormonal changes.
  • Post-splenectomy state.
  • Severe physical or emotional stress, or major trauma
LAP Score — MPN Comparison
The Leukocyte Alkaline Phosphatase (LAP) score reflects neutrophil alkaline phosphatase activity and is a classic cytochemical tool used to help distinguish between myeloproliferative neoplasms and reactive leukocytosis. Scores range from 0 to 400.
Condition Typical LAP Score Genetic Hallmark
CML Very low to absent (0–15) BCR-ABL1 (Ph+)
Polycythemia Vera High (>100) JAK2 V617F
Essential Thrombocythemia Normal to slightly high JAK2 CALR MPL
Primary Myelofibrosis Variable (normal to low) JAK2 CALR MPL
Leukemoid Reaction High None (reactive)
LAP score is largely superseded by molecular and cytogenetic testing in modern practice but remains a useful teaching tool for MPN differentiation.

Clinical Significance of a Low LAP score (NAP score)

A low LAP score is the more "exam-classic" finding because it points at a smaller, more specific list of diagnoses:

  • Chronic myeloid leukemia. The textbook association. Neutrophils carrying the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene express far less alkaline phosphatase [1,7].
  • Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). LAP is anchored to the cell surface by a GPI link, which is missing on PNH cells, so the score is low [1]. Today, high-sensitivity flow cytometry (utilizing FLAER, CD55, and CD59 markers) is the required gold standard for PNH diagnosis; the LAP score is no longer used clinically for this purpose [9].
  • Aplastic anemia. Reduced and abnormal neutrophil production lowers the score.
  • Pernicious anemia (severe vitamin B12 deficiency) can lower the score because of impaired neutrophil maturation.
  • Some myelodysplastic syndromes, especially those with higher blast counts [5].

A note on CML follow-up

A classic low score in chronic-phase CML can rise during superimposed infection, after splenectomy, or in blast crisis. The score is dynamic, not fixed, which is one reason it has been replaced for monitoring by BCR-ABL1 transcript measurement [8].

Troubleshooting the LAP/NAP Stain

LAP Score — Troubleshooting Guide
Common staining problems encountered during Leukocyte Alkaline Phosphatase (LAP) score preparation, their likely causes, and corrective actions.
Observation Likely Cause Corrective Action
All cells score 0
  • EDTA anticoagulant
  • Outdated reagents
  • Warm fixative
  • Use heparinized or capillary blood
  • Prepare fresh substrate
  • Chill fixative to 0–10°C
Weak or faded staining
  • Short incubation
  • Cold reagents
  • Old smears (>24–48 h)
  • Extend incubation to 15–30 min
  • Bring reagents to room temperature
  • Always use fresh smears
“Muddy” background
  • Inadequate rinsing
  • Unfiltered dye
  • Slides drying out
  • Rinse longer with gentle running water
  • Filter the staining solution
  • Keep slides immersed
Poor neutrophil morphology
  • Warm fixative
  • Over-fixation
  • Forceful rinsing
  • Use ice-cold fixative
  • Keep fixation to 30–60 seconds
  • Rinse gently
Non-specific lymphocyte staining
  • Over-staining
  • High pH
  • Contaminated counterstain
  • Check buffer pH (~9.0–9.4)
  • Replace counterstain
High RBC background
  • Poor washing after fixation
  • Low-quality diazo salt
  • Wash and dry slides thoroughly
  • Use high-purity Fast Blue BB or Fast Garnet GBC
LAP score is affected by pre-analytical variables; specimen preparation and reagent quality are critical to reliable results.

Newer semi-automated NAP rating systems [2], as well as flow cytometric quantification of neutrophil alkaline phosphatase [10], are increasingly utilized to reduce the subjectivity and inter-observer variability of manual microscopic scoring.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Why can't EDTA blood be used for the LAP stain?

EDTA chelates the specific divalent cations (namely zinc and magnesium) that alkaline phosphatase absolutely requires for its structural integrity and catalytic activity [11], inactivating the enzyme within minutes. The result is a falsely low score. Use heparinized blood or, ideally, fresh capillary blood smears made directly from a finger prick.

How is the leukocyte alkaline phosphatase score calculated?

Count 100 consecutive mature neutrophils and band forms under oil immersion. Grade each on a 0–4 scale based on staining intensity. Add the grades. The total falls between 0 and 400, with a normal adult range of about 20–100.

Is the LAP score still used to diagnose CML?

Not as a primary diagnostic tool. CML is confirmed by detecting BCR-ABL1 with quantitative RT-PCR or by finding the Philadelphia chromosome on cytogenetics [6,7]. The LAP stain is now an inexpensive adjunct and a teaching tool.

Can the LAP score change in the same CML patient over time?

Yes. A classically low LAP score in chronic-phase CML can climb toward normal during infection, after splenectomy, or in CML blast crisis. This is why LAP is interpreted alongside the rest of the clinical picture.

Why does pregnancy raise the LAP score?

LAP activity rises naturally during the second and third trimesters because of hormonal shifts, particularly higher estrogen and progesterone. The score returns to baseline after delivery.

What are the most common reasons for a false-low LAP score?

EDTA-anticoagulated blood, smears older than 24–48 hours, fixative warmer than 10°C, and unfiltered or expired diazonium salt. Fresh smears, chilled fixative, and freshly prepared and filtered reagents prevent most errors.

Glossary of Related Medical Terms

  • Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): Enzyme that removes phosphate groups; the version inside mature neutrophils is what this stain measures.
  • Azo dye: Colored compound formed when a diazonium salt reacts with naphthol; produces the visible granules during the LAP stain.
  • BCR-ABL1 fusion gene: Faulty gene formed by the t(9;22) translocation; the genetic hallmark of CML.
  • Diazonium salt: Reactive chemical that pairs with released naphthol to form the azo dye seen under the microscope.
  • GPI anchor: Molecular tether holding LAP and other proteins on the cell surface; missing in PNH.
  • Leukemoid reaction: Non-cancerous spike in white blood cells (often >50,000/µL) that can mimic leukemia.
  • Left shift: More immature neutrophils than usual in peripheral blood.
  • Naphthol AS-BI phosphate: The substrate that ALP cleaves during the stain.
  • Philadelphia chromosome (Ph): Shortened chromosome 22 carrying BCR-ABL1; the cytogenetic hallmark of CML.
  • Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI): Drug class (imatinib and others) that blocks BCR-ABL1; first-line CML therapy.

Disclaimer: This protocol is for educational purposes only. Local laboratory standard operating procedures take precedence. It is not intended to be a substitute for informed professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional for clinical decision-making. While the information presented here is derived from credible medical sources and is believed to be accurate and up-to-date, it is not guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See additional information.

References

  1.  Bain BJ, Bates I, Laffan MA. Dacie and Lewis Practical Haematology: Expert Consult: Online and Print (Elsevier) 12th Edition. 2016.
  2. Sugano, K., Hashi, K., Goto, M., Nishi, K., Maeda, R., Kono, K., Yamamoto, M., Okada, K., Kaga, S., Miwa, K., Mikami, T., & Masauzi, N. (2017). Semi-Automatic Rating Method for Neutrophil Alkaline Phosphatase Activity. Journal of clinical laboratory analysis31(1), e22022. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22022
  3. Kondo, T., Tasaka, T., Tomioka, N., Sano, F., Tokunaga, H., Suemori, S., Tsujioka, T., Matsuhashi, Y., Nakanishi, H., Wada, H., Tohyama, K., & Sugihara, T. (2016). Low neutrophil alkaline phosphatase score is a new aspect of calreticulin-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms. SpringerPlus5(1), 1146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2829-6
  4. Basquiera, A. L., Fassetta, F., Soria, N., Barral, J. M., Ricchi, B., & García, J. J. (2007). Accuracy of leukocyte alkaline phosphatase score to predict JAK2 V617F mutation. Haematologica92(5), 704–705. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.10991
  5. Lipshitz, J., Limaye, S., & Patel, D. (2010). Leukocyte alkaline phosphatase score correlation with bone marrow blast percentage in myelodysplastic syndrome. Acta haematologica124(3), 179–181. https://doi.org/10.1159/000320272
  6. Arber, D. A., Orazi, A., Hasserjian, R. P., Borowitz, M. J., Calvo, K. R., Kvasnicka, H. M., Wang, S. A., Bagg, A., Barbui, T., Branford, S., Bueso-Ramos, C. E., Cortes, J. E., Dal Cin, P., DiNardo, C. D., Dombret, H., Duncavage, E. J., Ebert, B. L., Estey, E. H., Facchetti, F., Foucar, K., … Tefferi, A. (2022). International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Blood140(11), 1200–1228. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2022015850
  7. Khoury, J. D., Solary, E., Abla, O., Akkari, Y., Alaggio, R., Apperley, J. F., Bejar, R., Berti, E., Busque, L., Chan, J. K. C., Chen, W., Chen, X., Chng, W. J., Choi, J. K., Colmenero, I., Coupland, S. E., Cross, N. C. P., De Jong, D., Elghetany, M. T., Takahashi, E., … Hochhaus, A. (2022). The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Myeloid and Histiocytic/Dendritic Neoplasms. Leukemia36(7), 1703–1719. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01613-1
  8. Hochhaus, A., Baccarani, M., Silver, R. T., Schiffer, C., Apperley, J. F., Cervantes, F., Clark, R. E., Cortes, J. E., Deininger, M. W., Guilhot, F., Hjorth-Hansen, H., Hughes, T. P., Janssen, J. J. W. M., Kantarjian, H. M., Kim, D. W., Larson, R. A., Lipton, J. H., Mahon, F. X., Mayer, J., Nicolini, F., … Hehlmann, R. (2020). European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia34(4), 966–984. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-0776-2
  9. Sutherland, D. R., Keeney, M., & Illingworth, A. (2012). Practical guidelines for the high-sensitivity detection and monitoring of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clones by flow cytometry. Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry82(4), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.21023
  10. McPherson, R. A., & Pincus, M. R. (2021). Henry's Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods (24th ed.). Elsevier.
  11. Coleman J. E. (1992). Structure and mechanism of alkaline phosphatase. Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure21, 441–483. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bb.21.060192.002301
Secret Link